Saturday, October 25, 2008

In Defense of House Church Meetings/ Cell/ Home Groups

Not to long ago, I listened in live to a conference over the internet and the preacher, a man I greatly admire and respect said something which greatly concerned me.

His message came from the book of Judges and highlighted a few stories from the book including the story of Micah in Judges 17. What really concerned me was the fact that in passing through this story, the preacher connected Micah and his mother’s sin in having an idol in their home and their own priest for worship with home fellowship groups. I do not have a direct quote but he said something like “And in this age many people are canceling services for these home group things” to which there was an extra loud AMEN in response.

I in no way mean to demean or speak against this particular minister, as I said earlier he has my respect and admiration. I however wish to address what I believe is an error in the message he communicated, and by no means him only, as I have heard quite a few preachers in recent times preach similar things.

Let me say from the beginning that I find no problem with House Church/ Cell or Home Group meetings. I believe they are biblical and that churches can benefit greatly from them in ways that a normal church service cannot (although my church does not have them). I am also concerned that many ministers who use the banner of apostolic speak out so strongly against techniques that are not only biblical but used by the apostles.

Jesus Met and Taught in Homes

Mark 2:1-3 NKJV
And again He entered Capernaum after some days, and it was heard that He was in the house. 2 Immediately many gathered together, so that there was no longer room to receive them, not even near the door. And He preached the word to them.

What house was this? From the story we are led to believe that it was actually a home as the four men were able to go to the rooftop and tear open the roof to lower their friend.

The Holy Spirit Was Poured Out On A Home Meeting

We are all aware of the fact that the Holy Spirit was poured out upon the 120 disciples in the upper room, what exactly was this upper room? Acts 1 tells us:

Acts 1:13-14
13 And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.
14 These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.

Luke makes it clear that Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Thomas, Bartholomew, Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, Simon Zelotes, Judas the brother of James abode in this upper room. Other translations say that they were staying there. This was not just a meeting place but rather a house where these disciples lived.

It must also be noted that the 120 received the Holy Spirit sitting down. This may seem to be insignificant unless you realize that this meeting was happening in a home and naturally they all sat to pray.

Acts 2:1-4
And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

Another question rises up from this particular incident: Why did they say these men were drunk? I would be led to believe that it was because they were at a house and thus the consumption of alcohol would have been probable.

Large Corporate Worship and Small Home Group Meetings Were the Book of Acts Standard

The book of Acts chapter 2 we are given a list of the early church’s activities:

Acts 2:42-47
42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,
47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.

In this list of activities you will note that there were two gatherings of the church:
1. In the temple
2. From house to house
Many suggest that in the early days of the church, that there were approximately 100,000 Christians in Jerusalem. They quite obviously needed a system by which everyone was taken care of and made accountable and the house church system did that, especially considering the fact that in the church’s infancy there were only 12 apostles.

The Church Met at John Mark’s Mother’s House

Acts 12 tells the story of Peter’s capture and what could have been his execution. It also tells of the details surrounding his miraculous deliverance.

Acts 12:5
5 Peter therefore was kept in prison: but prayer was made without ceasing of the church unto God for him.

Where did this church meet for its prayer meeting? The answer is given later on in the chapter in an interesting way.

God sends an angel to Peter who wakes him up and leads him out of the prison to the gate of the city and Peter all the while believes it is just a vision. The story continues:

Acts 12:11-12
11 And when Peter was come to himself, he said, Now I know of a surety, that the Lord hath sent his angel, and hath delivered me out of the hand of Herod, and from all the expectation of the people of the Jews.
12 And when he had considered the thing, he came to the house of Mary the mother of John, whose surname was Mark; where many were gathered together praying.

How did Peter know to go to this specific house? I have a simple answer that I believe is undeniable: Because that is the house the church met it. It was actually the home of John’s mom.

The New Testament Mentions Many House Churches


Anyone who is against house churches has to fight against allot of scripture which says that there were churches in people’s houses.

Acts 16:40
40 And they went out of the prison, and entered into the house of Lydia and when they had seen the brethren, they comforted them, and departed.

Rom 16:3-5
3 Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus:
4 Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles.
5 Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.

Philem 1-2
Paul, a prisoner of Jesus Christ, and Timothy our brother, unto Philemon our dearly beloved, and fellowlabourer,
2 And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellowsoldier, and to the church in thy house:


I would appreciate it if those reading who have any issues with what I have presented or differences with my view to comment. I am willing to reconsider my position if someone will show me scripture that proves otherwise. I do also appreciate other points of view.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think what the pastor was referring to was people who opt to attend churches at homes being led by someone who isn't a trained pastor and has not studied the word of god in a school setting.

there are a lot of home churches being led by people who at some point become disconnected with the church and opted to start their own without any training. they are often referred to as House Church/ Cell or Home Group meetings because the person leading in most cases is not a ordained pastor. The debate over what defines a "church" or "pastor" is up for debate by many and hince, why you have people who often have church services where it may not be a service at all, but just them going over a passage in the bible.

small groups, which is the term most used to what you are agreeing with usually meets to supplement sunday service, not replace it and serves at a springboard to continue the discussion and further aid in continuing fellowship with congregation with each other outside corporate worship.

I think the pastor is okay with small group meetings as long as it supplements corporate worship.

D.C. Lake said...

I would like to believe this. But I also would have liked for the pastor to have stated this....in the absence of stating it I am led to believe that he is totally against it and by implication condemning even the early church for their behavior.

My other question would be how much schooling does one need to lead this meetings? The disciples didn't have any of this.

Anonymous said...

Some people just aren't ready for things to change... but, over the years to come, I see home churches and home church meetings becoming very important to the move and spread of Christianity.

Janna Lynn said...

I agree with everything you said! and i have known of many churches that stared out in a person's home.. yet the first time i heard of home frindship groups/ cell groups i was kinda turned off because my first exposure to it was when i was visiting a church on a sunday and they anounced that the next sunday there will be no church because everyone is to meet with their cell groups to watch the super bowl! i thought the groups were set up to get people away from church.. and just to fellowship. but i have looked into other groups at other churches and have seen that is is a great tool and yes it is very biblical! So now i think it's a great idea and just lately have been getting ready to start one in my own home :) Please do not let yourself be offended by what the minister said about them.. maybe he saw them the way i first did.. and you know he could have changed his views since that message.

Addl said...

Cell Groups are one of the major ways of Evangelism in my church. If you go to Europe and don't have cell groups, you may not have any church to pastor at all. Many people here are fine visiting someones house, but they would never ever go to a church.

Anonymous said...

I agree with everything that you stated about home churching. Recently (in the last 2 years) my family has been home churching. A lot of people are against it amd think we are backsliding. But we believe that home churching is very beneficial especially because it is family integrated. Also at lauren, if somone feels called to home church there is no need for them to attend bible college for four years or some other act to qualify as "trained". If God has called someone to this type of ministry the only "training" a person needs is from God and the scriptures. A lot of times too much emphasis is put on having a certain degree or having a specific amount of experience, but in God's eyes, you should just be available. (Btw I'm not saying that I'm against bible college training. That direction is right for some people.)

created at TagCrowd.com